// Global Analysis Archive
The source argues Taiwan’s deterrence remains overly concentrated on conventional military capabilities while gray-zone disruption, communications sabotage, and information operations may define a cross-strait crisis. It suggests an all-hazards civil defense model—integrating government and civil society, improving training spend, shelters, and public alerting—could raise the costs of coercion and reduce expectations of a swift outcome.
The source argues that Taiwan’s Indigenous communities, particularly the Sakizaya in Hualien, interpret the China threat through historical trauma, land dispossession concerns, and limited political inclusion. It suggests these grievances may create openings for influence operations and weaken crisis cohesion unless deterrence planning is paired with meaningful Indigenous empowerment.
The source argues Taiwan’s deterrence remains overly concentrated on conventional military capabilities while gray-zone disruption, communications sabotage, and information operations may define a cross-strait crisis. It suggests an all-hazards civil defense model—integrating government and civil society, improving training spend, shelters, and public alerting—could raise the costs of coercion and reduce expectations of a swift outcome.
The source argues that Taiwan’s Indigenous communities, particularly the Sakizaya in Hualien, interpret the China threat through historical trauma, land dispossession concerns, and limited political inclusion. It suggests these grievances may create openings for influence operations and weaken crisis cohesion unless deterrence planning is paired with meaningful Indigenous empowerment.
| ID | Title | Category | Date | Views | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPT-5640 | Taiwan’s Deterrence Gap: Civil Defense and the Battle for Societal Continuity | Taiwan | 2025-07-20 | 0 | ACCESS » |
| RPT-5001 | Hualien’s Indigenous Lens on Taiwan’s Security: Land, Identity, and the Vulnerability Beijing Could Exploit | Taiwan | 2024-12-04 | 0 | ACCESS » |