Our Methodology
China Watch is committed to rigorous, transparent research. Below we outline how we gather, verify, and analyze information to produce our publications.
Data Sources
- Official Chinese Sources: National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), People's Bank of China (PBOC), State Council announcements
- International Organizations: IMF, World Bank, WTO, OECD data and reports
- Academic Research: Peer-reviewed journals, university research centers, policy institutes
- Corporate Filings: SEC filings, Hong Kong Stock Exchange disclosures, company reports
- News Sources: Verified reporting from established outlets in multiple languages
Verification Process
All claims and data points in our publications undergo verification:
- Source Identification: Every data point is traced to its original source
- Cross-Reference: Key findings are verified against multiple independent sources where possible
- Expert Review: Publications undergo internal review before publication
- Correction Policy: We promptly correct errors and note significant updates to published work
Analysis Framework
Our analysis combines quantitative data analysis with qualitative assessment of policy developments, institutional dynamics, and historical context. We aim to:
- Present findings clearly and accessibly without sacrificing nuance
- Acknowledge uncertainty and limitations in our analysis
- Distinguish between facts, analysis, and opinion
- Provide context that helps readers form their own judgments
Technology & Tools
We use modern data collection and analysis tools to monitor developments efficiently. This includes automated monitoring of official announcements, data visualization software, and AI-assisted translation and summarization. All automated outputs are reviewed and verified by human analysts before publication.
Questions about our methodology?
We welcome inquiries about our research process. Contact us with your questions.